Visual representation of adjacencies
eCAADe SIGraDi 2019 - Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution. (paper & talk)
W Lorenz, G. Wurzer. This paper is based on the assumption that a key challenge of good design is spatial organisation as a result of functional requirements. The authors present a new NetLogo application that assists designers to understand the proposed functional relationships (of spaces) by visualizing them graphically. ...
kleines Entwerfen customized bricks
digitales Entwerfen
G. Wurzer, W.E. Lorenz, S. Swoboda. Nach positiver Absolvierung der Lehrveranstaltung sind Studierende in der Lage algorithmisch zu Denken. Durch das Präzisieren der Problemstellung sind die Studierenden in der Lage den sinnvollen Einsatz von Algorithmen im Planungsprozess gedanklich zu erfassen. ...
Bridgemagazine Webpage
Webdesign für das bridgmagazin – Medieninhaber (Herausgeber) und Verleger: Österreichischer Bridgesportverband (ÖBV) | Audio Video Werbe-GmbH.
Stegreifentwerfen Hot Wood follow up
follow up "Würschtlstand"
W.E. Lorenz, G. Wurzer, S. Swoboda. Nach positiver Absolvierung der Lehrveranstaltung sind Studierende in der Lage algorithmisch zu Denken. Konkret erlangen sie die Fähigkeit jene Teile des Entwurfsprozesses zu erkennen, die ausprogrammiert zu schnelleren und allenfalls besseren Lösungen führen. Dabei greifen die Studierenden auf die Ergebnisse des kleinen Entwerfens "Hot Wood" aus dem Sommersemester 2019 zurück. ...
2.2.2 Characteristics - A Fractal is Self-Similar2.2.2.a Self-Similar and Self-AffineFractals are always self-similar, at least in some general sense - what does that mean? That means that on analysis of a certain structure will bring up the same basic elements on different scales. For example, details of a certain coastline look like larger parts of the whole curve; the characteristic - the irregularity - of this natural form remains the same from scale to scale. In this way fractals can also be described in terms of a hierarchy of self-similar components - e.g. trees and branches or town-, district- and local-centers. |
picture 02: The reduction ... The reduction of a paper in a copy machine is a similarity transformation. |
If a transformation reduces an object unequally in one or the other way, then the transformation is referred to as a self-affine transformation. In a self-affine transformation the internal angles of the shape and/or the relative proportions of the shape's sides might not remain the same - these curves are not exactly self-similar. For example parts of a “natural” fern or a snowflake are not exactly a copy of the whole as it is true for the computed examples of fractals, but nevertheless the parts look very much like the whole - this is called a statistical self-similarity because on average parts look equal[02] . Some examples of statistically self-similar structures in nature are the large and small branching structures of a tree, the bays and inlets of a coastline, weather fluctuations through time. But also man-made structures can be statistically self-similar such as the average of the Dow Jones, which shows similarities between hourly, monthly and yearly fluctuations[03] . |
2.2.2.b CoastlinesCoastlines in reality look similarly rugged no matter from which distance we observe them. That was also one important circumstance that Benoit Mandelbrot found out when he analyzed the coastline of Great Britain: A certain part of the curve always looked similar to the whole curve no matter on which scale he searched[04] . For example Norway has a lot of fjords, which means that its coastline is very rugged - zooming in on the fjords will offer a similar roughness. That the coastline of Norway is very rugged means that we will more quickly find a greater number of details from scale to scale and the length increases more quickly than in the case of a smooth coastline. The quickness the length approaches “infinity” is a characteristic for the examined coastline. On looking at the border of a Euclidean object such as a circle, something different happens. As we did with the coastline we zoom in infinitely on the curve, but instead of finding similar sections the zoomed part turns into a straight line. In contrast to that we would never find a straight line on the coastline but always a rugged part of the curve. |
2.2.2.c Self-Similar Structures in ArchitectureCastel del Monte: This is an early architectural attempt at self-similarity. The building has been erected over an octagon, with octagonal towers on its edges. The same form can be produced by putting the octagon in the copy machine of picture 02 with the input: "Reduce the octagon by a certain factor 1 to X and put it on the edges of the previous octagon". This could be repeated more often. In fact, what we see here is the first iteration of this expression - see picture 03. |
picture 03: Castel del Monte “The hunting seat of the Staufer emperor Friedrich II is an early attempt of self–similarity in architecture”. Castel del Monte was the hunting seat of the Hohenstaufer Emperor Friedrich II in Apulia (1240 - 1250). |
Bruce Goff: Some of Bruce Goffs buildings contain characteristics of fractal geometry, for example the Eugene Bavinger house, near Norman, Oklahoma, built in 1950. The floor plan describes a curve that shows a form like the self-similar Cephalopode Nautilus - the units of the Nautilus follow the structure of a logarithmic spiral curve. This curve is called self-similar because the angles of the tangents are equal in all points - see picture 04. |
picture 04: Bruce Goff Some pictures of the following two examples, the Eugene Bavinger house and Joe Price Studio, both by Bruce Goff, are taken from “The Architecture of the Jumping Universe” by Charles Jencks, pages 42 to 45. |
Another example of fractal architecture by Bruce Goff is the Joe Price Studio in Bartlesville, Oklahoma from 1956. All shapes include equivalent triangles on different scales; the angles are similar from scale to scale - 60 degrees or a multiple of it. The "meeting-area" is e.g. hexagonal, the walls of the music-room are three-cornered and the ceiling of this room consists of a three-cornered decoration for better sound quality through reflection - see picture 04[05] . |
picture 05: Some more examples for self-similarity One example for an early attempt of using self-similarity in architecture is the floor plan of the Tadsch Mahal in Agra/India. The middle octagon that is repeated in the four diagonals of the outer square forms the basic element. |
picture 05: The cathedral of Cologne The cathedral of Cologne is a good example for self-similar patterns in Gothic architecture. |
2.2.2.d Self-Similar Structures and CitiesCities: Self-similar patterns can also be found in cities in a more abstract respect. If we compare the function of rooms of a dwelling or a one-family house - living, working, walking, relaxing -, that is to say the way of dividing up space, with a quarter and the whole city we will find analogies in areas for working, living etc. Functions are repeated on different scales. But also the repetition of ways observed over years between the separate functions inside a dwelling within a day or ways in the city, e.g. to and from work, can be seen as fractal concepts. |
picture 06: Cameroon The image below shows a village of these days in Cameroon in Africa and is taken from “Die Geschichte der Stadt” by Leonardo Benevolo. |
2.2.2.e Other DisciplinesSelf-similarity is also found in other disciplines - the structure of our memory for example is also fractal. A certain word conjures up a complex network of images in connection with that word. It is not the object or similar objects that come up, but events and associations, for example a certain mountain tour for the word "mountain". By that a set of memories comes up to one’s mind, people that were present at the tour and other thoughts in connection with them. The word does not bring an abstract image to one’s mind but a complex set of interrelations to events and persons. Hardly any boundary can be drawn around these interrelations, which is also true for the border of the Mandelbrot set. The network for a certain word is of course different from person to person, because of individual experiences, but this is not so important. The different networks have enough similarities for communication. For conversation and books the fact that different networks exist is getting more and more of a problem because the information increases and so the nets that are conjured up and as a consequence also the interpretation of the meaning differ more and more. |
Footnotes[01] Bovill Carl, Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design (1996), Birkhäuser Bosten, ISBN 3-7643-3795-8, p.15 |