### eCAADe 2020:

Proceedings

FRACAM: A 2.5D Fractal Analysis Method for Facades; Test Environment for a Cell Phone Application to Measure Box Counting Dimension

**Talk and Proceeding**: eCAADe 2020 - RAnthropologic – Architecture and Fabrication in the cognitive age (Berlin, Germany, 2020 | virtual conference) FRACAM: A 2.5D Fractal Analysis Method for Facades

W Lorenz, G. Wurzer

eCAADe-conference, Berlin, Germany (virtual conference), 2020,

presentation (video)

### CAADRIA 2020:

Proceedings

FLÄVIZ in the rezoning process: A Web Application to visualize alternatives of land-use planning

**Talk and Proceeding**: CAADRIA 2020 - RE: Anthropocene, Design in the Age of Humans (Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2020 | virtual conference) FLÄVIZ in the rezoning process: A Web Application to visualize alternatives of land-use planning

W Lorenz, G. Wurzer

CAADRIA-conference, Bangkok, Thailand (virtual conference), 2020,

presentation (video)

### USA Chicago Exkursion 2019

Japan Exkursion 02.07.-17.07.2019 (book) W.E. Lorenz, A. Faller (Hrsg.). Mit Beiträgen der Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer der Exkursion nach "Chicago" (2019).

ISBN: 978-3-9504464-2-5

Das Buch beschreibt in einzelnen Kapiteln die vom Institut Architekturwissenschaften, Digitale Architektur und Raumplanung, organisierte Exkursion nach Chicago aus dem Jahr 2019. ...

### Stegreifentwerfen "gesteckt nicht geschraubt 2.0"

digitales Stegreifentwerfen

G. Wurzer, W.E. Lorenz, S. Swoboda. Im Zuge der Lehrveranstaltung wird die Digitalisierung vom Entwurfsprozess bis zur Produktion an Hand einer selbsttragenden Holzstruktur untersucht: vom Stadtmöbel über die Skulptur zur Brücke. ...

## 5.8.1 Midpoint DisplacementAs mentioned in |

picture 57: Midpoint displacement - curves Two curves produced by the midpoint displacement method with a fractal dimension D=1.3 - on the left - and D=1.8 - on the right side. Whether the curve moves up or down has been decided by using a coin. The pictures show the first to the sixth stage. |

A more complex form of the midpoint displacement method is the so-called Gaussian midpoint displacement, in which the displacement at each step is determined by a random choice from a Gaussian distribution. Following from that some of the displacements chosen at random will be positive and some negative, some will be large and others small. This time the displacement at each step will be scaled by a factor referred to as the Hurst exponent, which varies between 0 and 1. The scaling factor “W” is generated through the equation W=1/(2H), which means that if the Hurst exponent increases the scaling factor decreases and by that the fluctuations in the midpoint displacement process are getting smaller[02] . The fractal dimension results from the relation H.E. Hurst was a hydrologist who analyzed the variation of natural systems through time, like the variation of temperature, pressure, lake levels and tree rings, in which the so-called Hurst exponent can compare the variation. For determining the exponent the " |

## 5.8.1.a Fractal RhythmsBy rescaling range analysis, the fractal dimension of fractal rhythms in nature or man made compositions can be calculated, including the distribution of trunks in a wood, columns and walls. The main difference between Euclidean and fractal-rhythm-based grids lies in the complexity and in the lower symmetrical distribution of the latter, in which it is valid that the higher the fractal dimension of the grid, the more clearly the differences of the spaces, the jumps of width, can be seen. So again the fractal dimension is a measurable characteristic of order, with low dimensions near one, and surprise, with higher dimensions up to two[05]. As examples for fractal rhythms, buildings by Frank Lloyd Wright are valid, such as the grid of the major plan elements of the Willits House indicates. For measuring the fractal dimension of the grid the rhythmic variation can be translated into a bar chart, in which the different heights of the bars represent the different widths. Then the Hurst exponent and from that the fractal dimension can be determined. The horizontal width of the bars does not affect the calculation, see picture 58. |

picture 58: Frank Lloyd Wright Willits house - Fractal rhythm Frank Lloyd Wright - Willits house |

The picture above shows the ground plan of the Willits house overlapped by a planning grid based on the major elements, which has been translated into the step-function displayed below - at which the heights of the charts represent the widths of the grid lines from the left to the right and from the upper side of the plan to the bottom. |

For getting the Hurst exponent and by that the fractal dimension of the curve, the rescaled range analysis is used, at which the size of the maximum fluctuation of a variable over a range of time scales is looked at. For doing so, the step-function is first translated into a curve and overlapped by a grid, which is shown on picture below. By that the maximum fluctuation of the whole curve can be measured which results in 55.17 units. Then the curve is divided into two pieces with a time length of 1/2 each, giving two maximum fluctuations - 42.15 and 55.17 - which leads to an average value of 48.66. Four pieces, each of which represents a time length of 1/4, lead to maximum fluctuations of 43.56, 36.66, 31.88 and 55.17 with an average value of 41.82. Finally eight pieces lead to an average value of 30.56. Then the slope of the graph of the log(maximum fluctuations) versus the log(time scale) determines the Hurst exponent - H=0.28 and the fractal dimension D=2-H=1.72. |

Andrea Palladio - Villa Rotunda |

The layout of Palladio’s Villa Rotunda is based on a strict Euclidean grid that is symmetrical in two directions. |

average values of the maximum fluctuations: |

Chapter " |

picture 59: Hurst curve - Fractal rhythm The following pictures show the translation of two fractal curves - produced with the computer program “Benoit” - into step functions for getting two different planning grids, which may be used for the distribution of windows or walls. The resulting grids are given below the step functions in each case, using the width of 130cm for the base line and plus or minus 10cm steps for each line moving up or down respectively. curve 1: Hurst-exponent=0.5, D=1.5 |

curve 2: Hurst-exponent=0.3, D=1.7 |

Subsequently there are still many different possibilities to choose from. First there are different curves of the same fractal dimension; each time a curve is generated the resulting step-function looks different, but on the whole the character is similar. That means that curves of a high fractal dimension are rougher than curves with a lower dimension, which are smoother, i.e. there are no high jumps. Second the interpretation of the step function belongs to the planner, e.g. the first twenty steps may form the vertical rhythm, whereas the following are used as the horizontal ones. But it is also up to him which lines are decided to be walls and which open fields. |

## 5.8.1.b Visually Distinguishable SizeThe problem when translating of a noise curve into a sequence is the distinguishable size differences between the single widths. Carl Bovill solved this problem with the architectural scale based on human ability by Dom H. Van Der Laan. This architectural scale is based on the maximum distinguishable size differences between certain elements, with the major whole being defined by 7 units, the minor whole by 5.25, the major part by 4, the minor part by 3, the major piece by 2.25, the minor piece by 1.75, the major element by 1.25 units and finally the minor element by 1 unit. Through the step function a sequence of values can be given depending on the heights of the steps, e.g. 1, 3, 5, 4, 7, 6, 3, 6, and so on. These values are then translated by means of the architectural scale of Dom H. Van Der Laan, in which 1 is defined as the minor element, 2 the major element, ... and finally 8 being the major whole, see picture 60[08]. |

picture 60: Visually distinguishable size Sequence of elements based on the Van Der Laan scale, starting with the major whole on the left side. Translated in [cm] starting with 130cm being the width of the major whole the sequence runs: 130/97.5/74.3/55.7/41.8/32.5/23.2/18.6 |

"major part" + "minor part"="major whole" |

curve 1: The grid of the step-function from picture 59 with a fractal dimension D=1.5, using the Van Der Laan scale. |

curve 2: The grid of the step-function from picture 59 with a fractal dimension D=1.7, using the Van Der Laan scale. |

## 5.8.1.c Some Examples of Fractal RhythmsSmooth prefabricated concrete walls for noise abatement of the same height can be interpreted as two-dimensional areas of nearly endless width in the sense of Euclidean geometry. These boring unity walls in most cases have no relation to the environment such as a forest-top situated behind them, which mostly offers a fractal dimension of 1.3, or a mountain ridge. This fractal dimension can be used as the starting value for a fractal rhythm, generated as a step function of a noise-curve. The resulting concrete wall then consists of prefabricated elements of different widths and heights, which offer a mixture of order and surprise in the same way the background nature does - the fractal rhythm leads to a variation of a complex rhythm, where expectations are confirmed, see picture 61[09]. Fractal rhythms can also be used for the sizes and sequences of window strips, but also as a planning grid for different heights and widths of the front view of row houses. |

picture 61: Concrete walls for noise abatement straight concrete walls, for a noise abatement in front of treetops |

walls with a fractal rhythm, D=1.3, for a noise abatement in front of treetops |

fractal curve with a fractal dim. of 1.3 |

fractal curve resolved into a step function |

## 5.8.2 IFS in ArchitectureAnother possible application of fractal geometry to architecture is through the phenomenon of IFS, the iterated function system. Here the rules are more important than knowing what will be produced from the very beginning, which means that the results are influenced by the instructions and not by the primary products. Thus the planning method is the mechanism, rule or instruction and not the resulting form - which we do not know when we start the procedure. In a lecture held by Wolff Plotegg at the Technical University of Vienna he demonstrated some examples of his own, produced by rules without knowing what the result would be. E.g. designing a door normally means that its main function is opening and closing a room. Everyone has a certain idea what a door may look like, that is because of our experience. The opening-mechanism is in most cases vertically, the door itself is a thin rectangular object, and its only function is that of opening and closing. But then Wolff Plotegg thought about other rules: first the opening mechanism should be horizontal on the ground, the door itself should be a thick object and he defined another, second function of the door, it should also be a staircase. The result is not a door the way we all know, but a newly designed one. |

## 5.8.3 Mathematical FractalsAs mentioned in chapter " |

## Footnotes[01] Bovill Carl, Fractal Geometry in Architecture and Design (1996), Birkhäuser Bosten, ISBN 3-7643-3795-8, p.76. |