kleines Entwerfen "gesteckt nicht geschraubt"
G. Wurzer, W.E. Lorenz, S. Swoboda. Im Zuge der Lehrveranstaltung wird die Digitalisierung vom Entwurfsprozess bis zur Produktion an Hand einer selbsttragenden Holzstruktur untersucht: vom Stadtmöbel über die Skulptur zur Brücke. ...
Visual representation of adjacencies
eCAADe SIGraDi 2019 - Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution. (paper & talk)
W Lorenz, G. Wurzer. This paper is based on the assumption that a key challenge of good design is spatial organisation as a result of functional requirements. The authors present a new NetLogo application that assists designers to understand the proposed functional relationships (of spaces) by visualizing them graphically. ...
kleines Entwerfen customized bricks
G. Wurzer, W.E. Lorenz, S. Swoboda. Nach positiver Absolvierung der Lehrveranstaltung sind Studierende in der Lage algorithmisch zu Denken. Durch das Präzisieren der Problemstellung sind die Studierenden in der Lage den sinnvollen Einsatz von Algorithmen im Planungsprozess gedanklich zu erfassen. ...
The self-similarity dimension “Ds” is equivalent to Mandelbrot's fractal dimension “D”. It proceeds from the fact that in a self-similarity construction there exists a relationship between the scaling factor and the number of smaller pieces that the original construction is divided into. This is true for fractal and non-fractal structures: e.g. a line, as an example for a non-fractal structure, can be divided into three identical parts. In this case the number of new pieces “a” is three and the reduction factor “s” is one third, see picture 23. The dimension “Ds” results from the equation:
picture 23: The line
A one-dimensional Euclidean line can be constructed like a mathematical fractal as being shown in the picture below. The initiator is a line, the generator for example three lines of the length of one third. The initiator is replaced by the generator, which is then repeated for all three new lines of the first iteration, for all nine lines of the second iteration and so on. The length of this curve increases by , with and “s” being the number of pieces respectively the reduction-factor of the generator and “n” being the number of iterations. If the starting line has the unit length of one, the first iteration amounts to a total length of and the second iteration to , which leads to the conclusion that in contrast to fractal curves there is no increase in length.
Equally a square can be divided into four pieces by using the reducing factor of one half. If the reducing factor is one third then this results in nine similar parts and so on:
In general an object is a non-fractal Euclidean structure if there is no growth in length, area or volume as one observes it more closely, which also leads to the conclusion that Euclidean objects always have an integer dimension equal to its topological dimension. In contrast to that, fractal curves are objects that’s fractal dimension is greater than its topological dimension. E.g. the self-similarity dimension Ds of the topological one-dimensional Peano curve is generated by Ds=log(9)/log(1/3)=2. In this case the curve fills the surface it is lying on completely but if only one point is taken off, the curve nevertheless falls apart into two pieces.
The self-similarity dimension of the Koch curve:
The dimension can also be measured by using two different scales - scale comparison:
... number of pieces of the 1st scale=4
 The smallest “rn” for natural structures also has to be choosen carefully because at one stage the scale of "rn" becomes as small as the scale of the image itself and no increase in length would be observed. This is then called the lower scale of the object.